Inspect sources
Open the document, page or disclosure behind a material finding.
The methodology
Zorev applies a consistent fundamental-analysis framework that adapts to the company’s business model, sector, value drivers and risk profile. The software supports professional judgement instead of hiding it behind an unexplained recommendation.
Ten stages
Each stage stays connected to the previous one, so evidence, assumptions, valuation and confidence move together.
01
Establish what the analysis must answer before evidence collection begins.
02
Examine how the company creates value, earns revenue and sustains its competitive position.
03
Isolate the volume, pricing, cost, capital and cash variables that determine outcomes.
04
State what is believed, and what must be true for the belief to hold.
05
Record the source, publication date, confidence level and unresolved information.
06
Connect reported earnings with working capital, capital expenditure and free cash flow.
07
Link base, upside and downside cases to the operational assumptions behind them.
08
Search deliberately for the evidence and interpretations that weaken the conclusion.
09
Specify in advance what would prove the thesis wrong.
10
Compare each new disclosure with the existing claims and assumptions.
Uncertainty
Zorev distinguishes among reported facts, calculated metrics, management statements, analyst assumptions and AI-generated interpretations. Outputs are not presented as equally certain.
Reported fact
Disclosed in a company filing or financial statement.
Calculated metric
Derived from reported figures using a stated calculation.
Management statement
Asserted by the company, and not necessarily verified.
Analyst assumption
Chosen by the user, and editable at any time.
AI-generated interpretation
An assisted reading that requires analyst review.
Traceability
Users can inspect sources, assumptions, contradictory evidence and changes to the thesis over time.
Open the document, page or disclosure behind a material finding.
Review, edit and compare the assumptions driving each scenario.
See the evidence that conflicts with the current interpretation.
Follow how the thesis and its confidence level evolved as evidence arrived.
Zorev does the searching, structuring and monitoring. The analyst owns the judgement.
A demonstration shows how the framework structures evidence, claims, scenarios, the counter-thesis and continuous monitoring.
Request a demonstration